ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR RELIABLE TEST NOTES & ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR RELIABLE STUDY MATERIALS

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Notes & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Materials

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Notes & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Materials

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Notes, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Materials, Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Mock Exam, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Latest Exam Test, Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Simulator Fee

BONUS!!! Download part of 2Pass4sure ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vRNLnkfvf2__VWCBy439PTC1f4xyYsQE

Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor test braindumps are in the leading position in the editorial market, and our advanced operating system for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor latest exam torrent has won wide recognition. As long as you choose our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and pay successfully, you do not have to worry about receiving our learning materials for a long time. We assure you that you only need to wait 5-10 minutes and you will receive our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions which are sent by our system. When you start learning, you will find a lot of small buttons, which are designed carefully. You can choose different ways of operation according to your learning habits to help you learn effectively.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is recognized worldwide and is highly valued by employers. It is a testament to the candidate's knowledge and expertise in the field of information security management and auditing. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is also an excellent way to advance one's career and increase earning potential. Individuals who have earned the certification can work in various roles, including as an auditor, consultant, or manager in the field of information security.

In order to be eligible for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification exam, candidates must have a minimum of five years of professional experience, with at least two years of experience in information security management and one year of experience in ISMS audits. They must also have completed a PECB-recognized lead auditor training course or equivalent. Upon successful completion of the exam, candidates will receive a PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor certificate that is valid for three years.

To be eligible for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam, individuals must have a minimum of five years of professional experience in information security, including two years of experience in ISMS implementation or auditing. They must also have completed a PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor training course or equivalent. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam consists of multiple-choice questions and is available in several languages. Successful candidates demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard and are equipped to lead and manage a successful audit team. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is highly valued by organizations seeking to maintain the security and confidentiality of their information assets and provides a competitive advantage for professionals seeking career advancement in the field of information security.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Notes <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Notes - Valid PECB PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Materials

For candidates who are going to buy ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor training materials online, they may pay much attention to the quality of the exam dumps, since it will depend on whether they may pass the exam or not. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam braindumps of us are reviewed by experienced specialists, therefore the quality can be guaranteed. They also check ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Training Materials at times to ensure the timely update. Moreover, we offer you free demo to have a try, and you can have a try before buying. You will know the mode of the complete version of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q15-Q20):

NEW QUESTION # 15
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader guiding an auditor in training. You are testing her understanding of follow-up audits by asking her a series of questions to which the answer is either "true* or
'false'. Which four of the following questions should the answer be true"'

  • A. The outcome of a follow-up audit could be a recommendabon to suspend the client's certification
  • B. The outcome of a follow-up audit could lower a major nonconformity to minor status
  • C. A follow-up audit is required only in instances where a major nonconformity has been identified
  • D. A follow-up audit is required in all instances where nonconformities have been identified
  • E. A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are minor
  • F. A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are major
  • G. The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to the individual managing the audit programme and the audit client
  • H. The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to top management and the audit team leader who carried out the audit where the nonconformities were initially identified

Answer: E,F,G,H

Explanation:
A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are major. This is true because a major nonconformity is a situation that raises significant doubt about the ability of the organization's management system to achieve its intended results, and therefore requires immediate corrective action. A follow-up audit is necessary to verify the effectiveness of the corrective action and the conformity of the management system12.
A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are minor. This is true because a minor nonconformity is a situation that does not affect the capability of the management system to achieve its intended results, but represents a deviation from the specified requirements. A follow-up audit may be conducted to check the implementation of the corrective action and the improvement of the management system12.
The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to top management and the audit team leader who carried out the audit where the nonconformities were initially identified. This is true because the top management is responsible for ensuring the effectiveness and continual improvement of the management system, and the audit team leader is accountable for the audit process and the audit conclusions. The follow-up audit report should provide them with objective evidence of the status of the nonconformities and the corrective actions taken by the auditee13.
The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to the individual managing the audit programme and the audit client. This is true because the individual managing the audit programme is responsible for planning, implementing, monitoring and reviewing the audit activities, and the audit client is the organization or person requesting an audit. The follow-up audit report should inform them of the results of the follow-up audit and any changes in the certification status of the auditee13.
References :=
ISO 19011:2022 Guidelines for auditing management systems
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements ISO/IEC 17021-1:2022 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements


NEW QUESTION # 16
You are performing an ISMS initial certification audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to conduct the closing meeting. During the final audit team meeting, as an audit team leader, you agree to report 2 minor nonconformities and 1 opportunity for improvement as below:

Select one option of the recommendation to the audit programme manager you are going to advise to the auditee at the closing meeting.

  • A. Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date
  • B. Recommend certification after your approval of the proposed corrective action plan Recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year
  • C. Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months
  • D. Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months
  • E. Recommend certification immediately

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, clause 9.4.9 requires the certification body to make a certification decision based on the information obtained during the audit and any other relevant information1. The certification body should also consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee to address any nonconformities identified during the audit1. Therefore, when making a recommendation to the audit programme manager, an ISMS auditor should consider the nature and severity of the nonconformities and the proposed corrective actions.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should recommend certification after their approval of the proposed corrective action plan and recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year. The auditor should provide the following justification for their recommendation:
* Justification: This recommendation is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has only two minor nonconformities and one opportunity for improvement, which do not indicate a significant or systemic failure of their ISMS. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. An opportunity for improvement is defined as a suggestion for improvement beyond what is required by ISO/IEC 27001:20222. Therefore, these findings do not prevent or preclude certification, as long as they are addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should approve the proposed corrective action plan before recommending certification, to ensure that it is realistic, achievable, and effective. The auditor should also recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year, to verify that the corrective actions have been implemented and are working as intended.
The other options are not valid recommendations for the audit programme manager, as they are either too lenient or too strict for the given scenario. For example:
* Recommend certification immediately: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO
19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee before making a certification decision.
* Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor overreacts or exaggerates the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC
17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a re-audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A full scope re-audit is usually reserved for major nonconformities or multiple minor nonconformities that indicate a serious or widespread failure of an ISMS.
* Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor distrusts or doubts the auditee's commitment or capability to implement corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to conduct unannounced audits only under certain conditions, such as when there are indications of serious problems with an ISMS or when required by sector-specific schemes.
* Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor imposes or prescribes a specific time frame or scope for verifying corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a partial audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A partial audit may be appropriate for minor nonconformities, but the time frame and scope should be agreed upon with the auditee and based on the proposed corrective action plan.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems


NEW QUESTION # 17
Which reliability aspect of information is compromised when a staff member denies having sent a message?

  • A. Correctness
  • B. Availability
  • C. Confidentiality
  • D. Integrity

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 18
You are performing an ISMS audit at a European-based residential nursing home called ABC that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify the effectiveness of the continual improvement process.
During the audit, you learned most of the residents' family members (90%) receive WeCare medical devices promotion advertisements through email and SMS once a week via ABC's healthcare mobile app. All of them do not agree on the use of the collected personal data for marketing or any other purposes than nursing and medical care on the signed service agreement with ABC. They have very strong reason to believe that ABC is leaking residents' and family members' personal information to a non-relevant third party and they have filed complaints.
The Service Manager says that, after investigation, all these complaints have been treated as nonconformities. The corrective actions have been planned and implemented according to the nonconformity and corrective management procedure (Document reference ID: ISMS_L2_10.1, version 1).
You write a nonconformity which you will follow up on later. Select the words that best complete the sentence:

Answer:

Explanation:


NEW QUESTION # 19
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home (ABC) that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify the information security of ABC's healthcare mobile app development, support, and lifecycle process. During the audit, you learned the organization outsourced the mobile app development to a professional software development company with CMMI Level 5, ITSM (ISO/IEC 20000-1), BCMS (ISO 22301) and ISMS (ISO/IEC 27001) certified.
The IT Manager presented the software security management procedure and summarised the process as following:
The mobile app development shall adopt "security-by-design" and "security-by-default" principles, as a minimum. The following security functions for personal data protection shall be available:
Access control.
Personal data encryption, i.e., Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm, key lengths: 256 bits; and Personal data pseudonymization.
Vulnerability checked and no security backdoor
You sample the latest Mobile App Test report, details as follows:

You ask the IT Manager why the organisation still uses the mobile app while personal data encryption and pseudonymization tests failed. Also, whether the Service Manager is authorised to approve the test.
The IT Manager explains the test results should be approved by him according to the software security management procedure.
The reason why the encryption and pseudonymisation functions failed is that these functions heavily slowed down the system and service performance. An extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. The Service Manager agreed that access control is good enough and acceptable. That's why the Service Manager signed the approval.
You are preparing the audit findings. Select the correct option.

  • A. There is a nonconformity (NC). The Service Manager does not comply with the software security management procedure. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)
  • B. There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation and developer perform security tests that fail. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.29)
  • C. There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation and developer do not perform acceptance tests. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.29)
  • D. There is NO nonconformity (NC). The Service Manager makes a good decision to continue the service. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

Answer: A

Explanation:
The correct option is D. There is a nonconformity (NC). The Service Manager does not comply with the software security management procedure. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30). The IT Manager should have approved the test results according to the software security management procedure, not the Service Manager. The Service Manager's decision to accept the failed security tests also violates the "security-by-design" and "security-by-default" principles that the organization adopted. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant. The organization and developer did perform acceptance tests, but they failed (B, C). The Service Manager's decision to continue the service does not justify the nonconformity (A). Reference: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Clause 8.1 n2: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide, Domain 5: Conducting an ISO/IEC 27001 audit


NEW QUESTION # 20
......

The price for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification test's registration is somewhere around $100 to $1000. Thus, you would never risk your precious time and money. 2Pass4sure offers a demo version of the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) practice material which is totally free. You can try a free demo to make yourself more confident about the authenticity of the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) product. After buying the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor material, you can instantly use it.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Materials: https://www.2pass4sure.com/ISO-27001/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-actual-exam-braindumps.html

What's more, part of that 2Pass4sure ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vRNLnkfvf2__VWCBy439PTC1f4xyYsQE

Report this page